Methods Of Mathematical Physics
Methods Of Mathematical Physics
Jump to year
B1.19
commentState the convolution theorem for Laplace transforms.
The temperature in a semi-infinite rod satisfies the heat equation
and the conditions for for and as . Show that
where
B2.19
comment(a) The Beta function is defined by
Show that
(b) The function is defined by
where the integrand has a branch cut along the positive real axis. Just above the cut, . For just above the cut, arg . The contour runs from , round the origin in the negative sense, to (i.e. the contour is a reflection of the usual Hankel contour). What restriction must be placed on and for the integral to converge?
By evaluating in two ways, show that
where and are any non-integer complex numbers.
Using the identity
deduce that
and hence that
B3.19
commentThe function satisfies the third-order differential equation
subject to the conditions as and . Obtain an integral representation for of the form
and determine the function and the contour .
Using the change of variable , or otherwise, compute the leading term in the asymptotic expansion of as .
B4.19
commentLet . Sketch the path of const. through the point , and the path of const. through the point .
By integrating along these paths, show that as
where the constants and are to be computed.
B1.19
commentBy considering the integral
where is a large circle centred on the origin, show that
where
By using , deduce that .
B2.18
commentLet be the Laplace transform of , where satisfies
and
Show that
and hence deduce that
Use the inversion formula for Laplace transforms to find for and deduce that a solution of the above boundary value problem exists only if . Hence find for .
B3.19
commentLet
where is a path beginning at and ending at (on the real axis). Identify the saddle points and sketch the paths of constant phase through these points.
Hence show that as .
B4.19
commentBy setting , where and are to be suitably chosen, explain how to find integral representations of the solutions of the equation
where is a non-zero real constant and is complex. Discuss in the particular case that is restricted to be real and positive and distinguish the different cases that arise according to the of .
Show that in this particular case, by choosing as a closed contour around the origin, it is possible to express a solution in the form
where is a constant.
Show also that for there are solutions that satisfy
where is a constant.
B1.19
commentState the Riemann-Lebesgue lemma as applied to the integral
where is continuous and .
Use this lemma to show that, as ,
where is holomorphic, and . You should explain each step of your argument, but detailed analysis is not required.
Hence find the leading order asymptotic behaviour as of
B2.18
commentShow that
where is real and positive, and denotes the Cauchy principal value; the principal branches of etc. are implied. Deduce that
and that
Use to show that, if , then
What is the value of this integral if ?
B3.19
commentShow that the equation
has solutions of the form
Give examples of possible choices of to provide two independent solutions, assuming . Distinguish between the cases and . Comment on the case and on the case that is an odd integer.
Show that, if , there is a solution that is bounded as , and that, in this limit,
where is a constant.
B4.19
commentLet
where is real, is real and non-zero, and the path of integration runs up the imaginary axis. Show that, if ,
as and sketch the relevant steepest descent path.
What is the corresponding result if ?
B1.19
commentState and prove the convolution theorem for Laplace transforms.
Use the convolution theorem to prove that the Beta function
may be written in terms of the Gamma function as
B2.18
commentThe Bessel function is defined, for , by
where the path of integration is the Hankel contour and is the principal branch.
Use the method of steepest descent to show that, as ,
You should give a rough sketch of the steepest descent paths.
B3.19
commentConsider the integral
where is the principal branch and is a positive constant. State the region of the complex -plane in which the integral defines a holomorphic function.
Show how the analytic continuation of this function can be obtained by means of an alternative integral representation using the Hankel contour.
Hence show that the analytic continuation is holomorphic except for simple poles at , and that the residue at is
Part II
B4.19
commentShow that satisfies the differential equation
and find a second solution, in the form of an integral, for .
Show, by finding the asymptotic behaviour as , that your two solutions are linearly independent.