Hilbert Spaces
Hilbert Spaces
Jump to year
B1.10
commentSuppose that and are orthonormal bases of a Hilbert space and that .
(a) Show that .
(b) Show that .
is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator if for some (and hence every) orthonormal basis .
(c) Show that the set HS of Hilbert-Schmidt operators forms a linear subspace of , and that is an inner product on ; show that this inner product does not depend on the choice of the orthonormal basis .
(d) Let be the corresponding norm. Show that , and show that a Hilbert-Schmidt operator is compact.
B3.8
commentLet be a Hilbert space. An operator in is normal if . Suppose that is normal and that . Let .
(a) Suppose that is invertible and . Show that .
(b) Show that is normal, and that .
(c) Show that is normal.
(d) Show that is unitary.
(e) Show that is Hermitian.
[You may use the fact that, if is normal, the spectral radius of is equal to ]
B4.7
commentSuppose that is a bounded linear operator on an infinite-dimensional Hilbert space , and that is real and non-negative for each .
(a) Show that is Hermitian.
(b) Let . Show that
(c) Show that is an approximate eigenvalue for .
Suppose in addition that is compact and injective.
(d) Show that is an eigenvalue for , with finite-dimensional eigenspace.
Explain how this result can be used to diagonalise .
B1.10
commentLet be a Hilbert space and let .
(a) Define what it means for to be (i) invertible, and (ii) bounded below. Prove that is invertible if and only if both and are bounded below.
(b) Define what it means for to be normal. Prove that is normal if and only if for all . Deduce that, if is normal, then every point of Sp is an approximate eigenvalue of .
(c) Let be a self-adjoint operator, and let be a sequence in such that for all and as . Show, by direct calculation, that
and deduce that at least one of is an approximate eigenvalue of .
(d) Deduce that, with as in (c),
B3.8
commentLet be the space of all functions on the real line of the form , where is a polynomial with complex coefficients. Make into an inner-product space, in the usual way, by defining the inner product to be
You should assume, without proof, that this equation does define an inner product on . Define the norm by for . Now define a sequence of functions on by
Prove that is an orthogonal sequence in and that it spans .
For every define the Fourier transform of by
Show that
(a) for ;
(b) for all and ,
(c) for all .
B4.7
commentLet be a Hilbert space and let .
(a) Show that if then is invertible.
(b) Prove that if is invertible and if satisfies , then is invertible.
(c) Define what it means for to be compact. Prove that the set of compact operators on is a closed subset of .
(d) Prove that is compact if and only if there is a sequence in , where each operator has finite rank, such that as .
(e) Suppose that , where is invertible and is compact. Prove that then, also, , where is invertible and has finite rank.
B1.10
commentLet be a Hilbert space and let . Define what it means for to be bounded below. Prove that, if for some , then is bounded below.
Prove that an operator is invertible if and only if both and are bounded below.
Let be the sequence space . Define the operators on by setting
for all . Check that but . Let . For each , explain why is invertible, and define
Show that, for all , we have , but . Deduce that, for all , the operator is bounded below, but is not invertible. Deduce also that .
Let with , and for , define the element of by
Prove that but that as . Deduce that, for is not bounded below.
B3.8
commentLet be an infinite-dimensional, separable Hilbert space. Let be a compact linear operator on , and let be a non-zero, approximate eigenvalue of . Prove that is an eigenvalue, and that the corresponding eigenspace is finite-dimensional.
Let be a compact, self-adjoint operator on . Prove that there is an orthonormal basis of , and a sequence in , such that (i) and (ii) as .
Now let be compact, self-adjoint and injective. Let be a bounded self-adjoint operator on such that . Prove that has an orthonormal basis , where, for every is an eigenvector, both of and of .
[You may assume, without proof, results about self-adjoint operators on finite-dimensional spaces.]
B4.7
commentThroughout this question, is an infinite-dimensional, separable Hilbert space. You may use, without proof, any theorems about compact operators that you require.
Define a Fredholm operator , on a Hilbert space , and define the index of .
(i) Prove that if is Fredholm then is closed.
(ii) Let and let have finite rank. Prove that also has finite rank.
(iii) Let , where is the identity operator on and has finite rank; let . By considering and (or otherwise) prove that is Fredholm with ind .
(iv) Let be Fredholm with ind . Prove that , where is invertible and has finite rank.
[You may wish to note that effects an isomorphism from onto ; also ker and have the same finite dimension.]
(v) Deduce from (iii) and (iv) that is Fredholm with ind if and only if with invertible and compact.
(vi) Explain briefly, by considering suitable shift operators on (i.e. not using any theorems about Fredholm operators) that, for each , there is a Fredholm operator on with ind .
B1.10
commentState and prove the Riesz representation theorem for bounded linear functionals on a Hilbert space .
[You may assume, without proof, that , for every closed subspace of .]
Prove that, for every , there is a unique such that for every . Prove that for every .
Define a normal operator . Prove that is normal if and only if for every . Deduce that every point in the spectrum of a normal operator is an approximate eigenvalue of .
[You may assume, without proof, any general criterion for the invertibility of a bounded linear operator on .]
B3.8
commentLet be a bounded linear operator on a Hilbert space . Define what it means to say that is (i) compact, and (ii) Fredholm. What is the index, ind , of a Fredholm operator ?
Let be bounded linear operators on . Prove that and are Fredholm if and only if both and are Fredholm. Prove also that if is invertible and is Fredholm then .
Let be a compact linear operator on . Prove that is Fredholm with index zero.
B4.7
commentWrite an essay on the use of Hermite functions in the elementary theory of the Fourier transform on .
[You should assume, without proof, any results that you need concerning the approximation of functions by Hermite functions.]