• # 3.II.13F

State precisely the inverse function theorem for a smooth map $F$ from an open subset of $\mathbf{R}^{2}$ to $\mathbf{R}^{2}$

Define $F: \mathbf{R}^{2} \rightarrow \mathbf{R}^{2}$ by

$F(x, y)=\left(x^{3}-x-y^{2}, y\right)$

Determine the open subset of $\mathbf{R}^{2}$ on which $F$ is locally invertible.

Let $C$ be the curve $\left\{(x, y) \in \mathbf{R}^{2}: x^{3}-x-y^{2}=0\right\}$. Show that $C$ is the union of the two subsets $C_{1}=\{(x, y) \in C: x \in[-1,0]\}$ and $C_{2}=\{(x, y) \in C: x \geqslant 1\}$. Show that for each $y \in \mathbf{R}$ there is a unique $x=p(y)$ such that $(x, y) \in C_{2}$. Show that $F$ is locally invertible at all points of $C_{2}$, and deduce that $p(y)$ is a smooth function of $y$.

[A function is said to be smooth when it is infinitely differentiable.]

comment

• # 3.II.14H

Assuming the principle of the argument, prove that any polynomial of degree $n$ has precisely $n$ zeros in $\mathbf{C}$, counted with multiplicity.

Consider a polynomial $p(z)=z^{4}+a z^{3}+b z^{2}+c z+d$, and let $R$ be a positive real number such that $|a| R^{3}+|b| R^{2}+|c| R+|d|. Define a curve $\Gamma:[0,1] \rightarrow \mathbf{C}$ by

$\Gamma(t)= \begin{cases}p\left(R e^{\pi i t}\right) & \text { for } 0 \leqslant t \leqslant \frac{1}{2} \\ (2-2 t) p(i R)+(2 t-1) p(R) & \text { for } \frac{1}{2} \leqslant t \leqslant 1\end{cases}$

Show that the winding number $n(\Gamma, 0)=1$.

Suppose now that $p(z)$ has real coefficients, that $z^{4}-b z^{2}+d$ has no real zeros, and that the real zeros of $p(z)$ are all strictly negative. Show that precisely one of the zeros of $p(z)$ lies in the quadrant $\{x+i y: x>0, y>0\}$.

[Standard results about winding numbers may be quoted without proof; in particular, you may wish to use the fact that if $\gamma_{i}:[0,1] \rightarrow \mathbf{C}, i=1,2$, are two closed curves with $\left|\gamma_{2}(t)-\gamma_{1}(t)\right|<\left|\gamma_{1}(t)\right|$ for all $t$, then $n\left(\gamma_{1}, 0\right)=n\left(\gamma_{2}, 0\right)$.]

comment

• # 3.I.5D

The transformation

$w=i\left(\frac{1-z}{1+z}\right)$

maps conformally the interior of the unit disc $D$ onto the upper half-plane $H_{+}$, and maps the upper and lower unit semicircles $C_{+}$and $C_{-}$onto the positive and negative real axis $\mathbb{R}_{+}$and $\mathbb{R}_{-}$, respectively.

Consider the Dirichlet problem in the upper half-plane:

$\frac{\partial^{2} f}{\partial u^{2}}+\frac{\partial^{2} f}{\partial v^{2}}=0 \quad \text { in } \quad H_{+} ; \quad f(u, v)= \begin{cases}1 & \text { on } \mathbb{R}_{+} \\ 0 & \text { on } \mathbb{R}_{-}\end{cases}$

Its solution is given by the formula

$f(u, v)=\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{\pi} \arctan \left(\frac{u}{v}\right) .$

Using this result, determine the solution to the Dirichlet problem in the unit disc:

$\frac{\partial^{2} F}{\partial x^{2}}+\frac{\partial^{2} F}{\partial y^{2}}=0 \quad \text { in } \quad D ; \quad F(x, y)= \begin{cases}1 & \text { on } C_{+} \\ 0 & \text { on } C_{-}\end{cases}$

comment

• # 3.II.17G

Write down Maxwell's equations in vacuo and show that they admit plane wave solutions in which

$\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{x}, t)=\operatorname{Re}\left(\mathbf{E}_{0} e^{i(\omega t-\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{x})}\right), \quad \mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{E}_{0}=0,$

where $\mathbf{E}_{0}$ and $\mathbf{k}$ are constant vectors. Find the corresponding magnetic field $\mathbf{B}(\mathbf{x}, t)$ and the relationship between $\omega$ and $\mathbf{k}$.

Write down the relations giving the discontinuities (if any) in the normal and tangential components of $\mathbf{E}$ and $\mathbf{B}$ across a surface $z=0$ which carries surface charge density $\sigma$ and surface current density $\mathbf{j}$.

Suppose that a perfect conductor occupies the region $z<0$, and that a plane wave with $\mathbf{k}=(0,0,-k), \mathbf{E}_{0}=\left(E_{0}, 0,0\right)$ is incident from the vacuum region $z>0$. Show that the boundary conditions at $z=0$ can be satisfied if a suitable reflected wave is present, and find the induced surface charge and surface current densities.

comment

• # 3.II.18A

State and prove Bernoulli's theorem for a time-dependent irrotational flow of an inviscid fluid.

A large vessel is part-filled with inviscid liquid of density $\rho$. The pressure in the air above the liquid is maintained at the constant value $P+p_{a}$, where $p_{a}$ is atmospheric pressure and $P>0$. Liquid can flow out of the vessel along a cylindrical tube of length $L$. The radius $a$ of the tube is much smaller than both $L$ and the linear dimensions of the vessel. Initially the tube is sealed and is full of liquid. At time $t=0$ the tube is opened and the liquid starts to flow. Assuming that the tube remains full of liquid, that the pressure at the open end of the tube is atmospheric and that $P$ is so large that gravity is negligible, determine the flux of liquid along the tube at time $t$.

comment

• # 3.I.2H

Show that the Gaussian curvature $K$ at an arbitrary point $(x, y, z)$ of the hyperboloid $z=x y$, as an embedded surface in $\mathbf{R}^{3}$, is given by the formula

$K=-1 /\left(1+x^{2}+y^{2}\right)^{2} .$

comment
• # 3.II.12H

Describe the stereographic projection map from the sphere $S^{2}$ to the extended complex plane $\mathbf{C}_{\infty}$, positioned equatorially. Prove that $w, z \in \mathbf{C}_{\infty}$ correspond to antipodal points on $S^{2}$ if and only if $w=-1 / \bar{z}$. State, without proof, a result which relates the rotations of $S^{2}$ to a certain group of Möbius transformations on $\mathbf{C}_{\infty}$.

Show that any circle in the complex plane corresponds, under stereographic projection, to a circle on $S^{2}$. Let $C$ denote any circle in the complex plane other than the unit circle; show that $C$ corresponds to a great circle on $S^{2}$ if and only if its intersection with the unit circle consists of two points, one of which is the negative of the other.

[You may assume the result that a Möbius transformation on the complex plane sends circles and straight lines to circles and straight lines.]

comment

• # 3.I.1E

(i) Give an example of an integral domain that is not a unique factorization domain.

(ii) For which integers $n$ is $\mathbb{Z} / n \mathbb{Z}$ an integral domain?

comment
• # 3.II.11E

Suppose that $R$ is a ring. Prove that $R[X]$ is Noetherian if and only if $R$ is Noetherian.

comment

• # 3.II.10H

(a) Define what is meant by the trace of a complex $n \times n$ matrix $A$. If $T$ denotes an $n \times n$ invertible matrix, show that $A$ and $T A T^{-1}$ have the same trace.

(b) If $\lambda_{1}, \ldots, \lambda_{r}$ are distinct non-zero complex numbers, show that the endomorphism of $\mathbf{C}^{r}$ defined by the matrix

$\Lambda=\left(\begin{array}{ccc} \lambda_{1} & \ldots & \lambda_{1}^{r} \\ \vdots & \ldots & \vdots \\ \lambda_{r} & \ldots & \lambda_{r}^{r} \end{array}\right)$

has trivial kernel, and hence that the same is true for the transposed matrix $\Lambda^{t}$.

For arbitrary complex numbers $\lambda_{1}, \ldots, \lambda_{n}$, show that the vector $(1, \ldots, 1)^{t}$ is not in the kernel of the endomorphism of $\mathbf{C}^{n}$ defined by the matrix

$\left(\begin{array}{ccc} \lambda_{1} & \ldots & \lambda_{n} \\ \vdots & \ldots & \vdots \\ \lambda_{1}^{n} & \ldots & \lambda_{n}^{n} \end{array}\right)$

unless all the $\lambda_{i}$ are zero.

[Hint: reduce to the case when $\lambda_{1}, \ldots, \lambda_{r}$ are distinct non-zero complex numbers, with $r \leqslant n$, and each $\lambda_{j}$ for $j>r$ is either zero or equal to some $\lambda_{i}$ with $i \leqslant r$. If the kernel of the endomorphism contains $(1, \ldots, 1)^{t}$, show that it also contains a vector of the form $\left(m_{1}, \ldots, m_{r}, 0, \ldots, 0\right)^{t}$ with the $m_{i}$ strictly positive integers.]

(c) Assuming the fact that any complex $n \times n$ matrix is conjugate to an uppertriangular one, prove that if $A$ is an $n \times n$ matrix such that $A^{k}$ has zero trace for all $1 \leqslant k \leqslant n$, then $A^{n}=0 .$

comment

• # 3.I.9C

A hungry student always chooses one of three places to get his lunch, basing his choice for one day on his gastronomic experience the day before. He sometimes tries a sandwich from Natasha's Patisserie: with probability $1 / 2$ this is delicious so he returns the next day; if the sandwich is less than delicious, he chooses with equal probability $1 / 4$ either to eat in Hall or to cook for himself. Food in Hall leaves no strong impression, so he chooses the next day each of the options with equal probability $1 / 3$. However, since he is a hopeless cook, he never tries his own cooking two days running, always preferring to buy a sandwich the next day. On the first day of term the student has lunch in Hall. What is the probability that 60 days later he is again having lunch in Hall?

[ Note $0^{0}=1$.]

comment

• # 3.I.6A

If $T_{i j}$ is a second rank tensor such that $b_{i} T_{i j} c_{j}=0$ for every vector $\mathbf{b}$ and every vector c, show that $T_{i j}=0$.

Let $S$ be a closed surface with outward normal $\mathbf{n}$ that encloses a three-dimensional region having volume $V$. The position vector is $\mathbf{x}$. Use the divergence theorem to find

$\int_{S}(\mathbf{b} \cdot \mathbf{x})(\mathbf{c} \cdot \mathbf{n}) d S$

for constant vectors $\mathbf{b}$ and $\mathbf{c}$. Hence find

$\int_{S} x_{i} n_{j} d S$

and deduce the values of

$\int_{S} \mathbf{x} \cdot \mathbf{n} d S \text { and } \int_{S} \mathbf{x} \times \mathbf{n} d S$

comment
• # 3.II.15G

(a) Find the Fourier sine series of the function

$f(x)=x$

for $0 \leqslant x \leqslant 1$.

(b) The differential operator $L$ acting on $y$ is given by

$L[y]=y^{\prime \prime}+y^{\prime}$

Show that the eigenvalues $\lambda$ in the eigenvalue problem

$L[y]=\lambda y, \quad y(0)=y(1)=0$

are given by $\lambda=-n^{2} \pi^{2}-\frac{1}{4}, \quad n=1,2, \ldots$, and find the corresponding eigenfunctions $y_{n}(x)$.

By expressing the equation $L[y]=\lambda y$ in Sturm-Liouville form or otherwise, write down the orthogonality relation for the $y_{n}$. Assuming the completeness of the eigenfunctions and using the result of part (a), find, in the form of a series, a function $y(x)$ which satisfies

$L[y]=x e^{-x / 2}$

and $y(0)=y(1)=0$.

comment

• # 3.I.4F

(i) The set $X=\mathbf{Z}$ of the integers, with a subset $A$ of $X$ called "open" when $A$ is either finite or the whole set $X$;

(ii) The set $X=\mathbf{Z}$ of the integers, with a subset $A$ of $X$ called "open" when, for each element $x \in A$ and every even integer $n, x+n$ is also in $A$

comment

• # 3.II.19D

(a) Define the QR factorization of a rectangular matrix and explain how it can be used to solve the least squares problem of finding an $x^{*} \in \mathbb{R}^{n}$ such that

$\left\|A x^{*}-b\right\|=\min _{x \in \mathbb{R}^{n}}\|A x-b\|, \quad \text { where } \quad A \in \mathbb{R}^{m \times n}, \quad b \in \mathbb{R}^{m}, \quad m \geqslant n,$

and the norm is the Euclidean distance $\|y\|=\sqrt{\sum_{i=1}^{m}\left|y_{i}\right|^{2}}$.

(b) Define a Householder transformation (reflection) $H$ and prove that $H$ is an orthogonal matrix.

(c) Using Householder reflection, solve the least squares problem for the case

$A=\left[\begin{array}{rr} 2 & 4 \\ 1 & -1 \\ 2 & 1 \end{array}\right], \quad b=\left[\begin{array}{l} 1 \\ 5 \\ 1 \end{array}\right]$

and find the value of $\left\|A x^{*}-b\right\|=\min _{x \in \mathbb{R}^{2}}\|A x-b\|$.

comment

• # 3.II.20C

Explain what is meant by a two-person zero-sum game with payoff matrix $A=\left(a_{i j}: 1 \leqslant i \leqslant m, \quad 1 \leqslant j \leqslant n\right)$ and what is meant by an optimal strategy $p=\left(p_{i}: 1 \leqslant i \leqslant m\right)$.

Consider the following betting game between two players: each player bets an amount $1,2,3$ or 4 ; if both bets are the same, then the game is void; a bet of 1 beats a bet of 4 but otherwise the larger bet wins; the winning player collects both bets. Write down the payoff matrix $A$ and explain why the optimal strategy $p=\left(p_{1}, p_{2}, p_{3}, p_{4}\right)^{T}$ must satisfy $(A p)_{i} \leqslant 0$ for all $i$. Hence find $p$.

comment

• # 3.I $7 \mathrm{~B} \quad$

Define the quantum mechanical operators for the angular momentum $\hat{\mathbf{L}}$ and the total angular momentum $\hat{L}^{2}$ in terms of the operators $\hat{\mathbf{x}}$ and $\boldsymbol{\nabla}$. Calculate the commutators $\left[\hat{L}_{i}, \hat{L}_{j}\right]$ and $\left[\hat{L}^{2}, \hat{L}_{i}\right]$.

comment
• # 3.II.16B

The expression $\Delta_{\psi} A$ denotes the uncertainty of a quantum mechanical observable $A$ in a state with normalised wavefunction $\psi$. Prove that the Heisenberg uncertainty principle

$\left(\Delta_{\psi} x\right)\left(\Delta_{\psi} p\right) \geqslant \frac{\hbar}{2}$

holds for all normalised wavefunctions $\psi(x)$ of one spatial dimension.

[You may quote Schwarz's inequality without proof.]

A Gaussian wavepacket evolves so that at time $t$ its wavefunction is

$\psi(x, t)=(2 \pi)^{-\frac{1}{4}}(1+i \hbar t)^{-\frac{1}{2}} \exp \left(-\frac{x^{2}}{4(1+i \hbar t)}\right)$

Calculate the uncertainties $\Delta_{\psi} x$ and $\Delta_{\psi} p$ at each time $t$, and hence verify explicitly that the uncertainty principle holds at each time $t$.

[You may quote without proof the results that if $\operatorname{Re}(a)>0$ then

$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \exp \left(-\frac{x^{2}}{a^{*}}\right) x^{2} \exp \left(-\frac{x^{2}}{a}\right) d x=\frac{1}{4}\left(\frac{\pi}{2}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}} \frac{|a|^{3}}{(\operatorname{Re}(a))^{\frac{3}{2}}}$

and

$\left.\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\left(\frac{d}{d x} \exp \left(-\frac{x^{2}}{a^{*}}\right)\right)\left(\frac{d}{d x} \exp \left(-\frac{x^{2}}{a}\right)\right) d x=\left(\frac{\pi}{2}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}} \frac{|a|}{(\operatorname{Re}(a))^{\frac{3}{2}}} \cdot\right]$

comment

• # 3.I.8C

One hundred children were asked whether they preferred crisps, fruit or chocolate. Of the boys, 12 stated a preference for crisps, 11 for fruit, and 17 for chocolate. Of the girls, 13 stated a preference for crisps, 14 for fruit, and 33 for chocolate. Answer each of the following questions by carrying out an appropriate statistical test.

(a) Are the data consistent with the hypothesis that girls find all three types of snack equally attractive?

(b) Are the data consistent with the hypothesis that boys and girls show the same distribution of preferences?

comment