Paper 1, Section II, 16G

Logic and Set Theory | Part II, 2021

Let SS and TT be sets of propositional formulae.

(a) What does it mean to say that SS is deductively closed? What does it mean to say that SS is consistent? Explain briefly why if SS is inconsistent then some finite subset of SS is inconsistent.

(b) We write STS \vdash T to mean StS \vdash t for all tTt \in T. If STS \vdash T and TST \vdash S we say SS and TT are equivalent. If SS is equivalent to a finite set FF of formulae we say that SS is finitary. Show that if SS is finitary then there is a finite set RSR \subset S with RSR \vdash S.

(c) Now let T0,T1,T2,T_{0}, T_{1}, T_{2}, \ldots be deductively closed sets of formulae with

T0T1T2T_{0} \subset T_{1} \subset T_{2} \subset \cdots

Show that each TiT_{i} is consistent.

Let T=i=0TiT=\bigcup_{i=0}^{\infty} T_{i}. Show that TT is consistent and deductively closed, but that it is not finitary.

Typos? Please submit corrections to this page on GitHub.