Paper 2, Section II, G

Logic and Set Theory | Part II, 2009

(i) Give an axiom system and rules of inference for the classical propositional calculus, and explain the notion of syntactic entailment. What does it mean to say that a set of propositions is consistent? Let PP be a set of primitive propositions and let Φ\Phi be a maximal consistent set of propositional formulae in the language based on PP. Show that there is a valuation v:P{T,F}v: P \rightarrow\{T, F\} with respect to which all members of Φ\Phi are true.

[You should state clearly but need not prove those properties of syntactic entailment which you use.]

(ii) Exhibit a theory TT which axiomatizes the collection of groups all of whose nonunit elements have infinite order. Is this theory finitely axiomatizable? Is the theory of groups all of whose elements are of finite order axiomatizable? Justify your answers.

Typos? Please submit corrections to this page on GitHub.