A 1.71 . 7 \quad B1.12

Logic, Computation and Set Theory | Part II, 2002

(i) State the Knaster-Tarski fixed point theorem. Use it to prove the Cantor-Bernstein Theorem; that is, if there exist injections A→BA \rightarrow B and B→AB \rightarrow A for two sets AA and BB then there exists a bijection A→BA \rightarrow B.

(ii) Let AA be an arbitrary set and suppose given a subset RR of PA×AP A \times A. We define a subset B⊆AB \subseteq A to be RR-closed just if whenever (S,a)∈R(S, a) \in R and S⊆BS \subseteq B then a∈Ba \in B. Show that the set of all RR-closed subsets of AA is a complete poset in the inclusion ordering.

Now assume that AA is itself equipped with a partial ordering ⩽\leqslant.

(a) Suppose RR satisfies the condition that if b⩾a∈Ab \geqslant a \in A then ({b},a)∈R(\{b\}, a) \in R.

Show that if BB is RR-closed then c⩽b∈Bc \leqslant b \in B implies c∈Bc \in B.

(b) Suppose that RR satisfies the following condition. Whenever (S,a)∈R(S, a) \in R and b⩽ab \leqslant a then there exists T⊆AT \subseteq A such that (T,b)∈R(T, b) \in R, and for every t∈Tt \in T we have (i) ({b},t)∈R(\{b\}, t) \in R, and (ii) t⩽st \leqslant s for some s∈Ss \in S. Let BB and CC be RR-closed subsets of AA. Show that the set

[B→C]={a∈A∣∀b⩽a(b∈B⇒b∈C)}[B \rightarrow C]=\{a \in A \mid \forall b \leqslant a(b \in B \Rightarrow b \in C)\}

is RR-closed.

Typos? Please submit corrections to this page on GitHub.