B1.10

Hilbert Spaces | Part II, 2002

Let HH be a Hilbert space and let T∈B(H)T \in \mathcal{B}(H). Define what it means for TT to be bounded below. Prove that, if LT=IL T=I for some L∈B(H)L \in \mathcal{B}(H), then TT is bounded below.

Prove that an operator T∈B(H)T \in \mathcal{B}(H) is invertible if and only if both TT and T∗T^{*} are bounded below.

Let HH be the sequence space ℓ2\ell^{2}. Define the operators S,RS, R on HH by setting

S(ξ)=(0,ξ1,ξ2,ξ3,…),R(ξ)=(ξ2,ξ3,ξ4,…),S(\xi)=\left(0, \xi_{1}, \xi_{2}, \xi_{3}, \ldots\right), \quad R(\xi)=\left(\xi_{2}, \xi_{3}, \xi_{4}, \ldots\right),

for all ξ=(ξ1,ξ2,ξ3,…)∈ℓ2\xi=\left(\xi_{1}, \xi_{2}, \xi_{3}, \ldots\right) \in \ell^{2}. Check that RS=IR S=I but SR≠IS R \neq I. Let D={λ∈C:∣λ∣<D=\{\lambda \in \mathbb{C}:|\lambda|< 1}1\}. For each λ∈D\lambda \in D, explain why I−λRI-\lambda R is invertible, and define

R(λ)=(I−λR)−1RR(\lambda)=(I-\lambda R)^{-1} R

Show that, for all λ∈D\lambda \in D, we have R(λ)(S−λI)=IR(\lambda)(S-\lambda I)=I, but (S−λI)R(λ)≠I(S-\lambda I) R(\lambda) \neq I. Deduce that, for all λ∈D\lambda \in D, the operator S−λIS-\lambda I is bounded below, but is not invertible. Deduce also that Sp⁡S={λ∈C:∣λ∣⩽1}\operatorname{Sp} S=\{\lambda \in \mathbb{C}:|\lambda| \leqslant 1\}.

Let λ∈C\lambda \in \mathbb{C} with ∣λ∣=1|\lambda|=1, and for n=1,2,…n=1,2, \ldots, define the element xnx_{n} of ℓ2\ell^{2} by

xn=n−1/2(λ−1,λ−2,…,λ−n,0,0,…).x_{n}=n^{-1 / 2}\left(\lambda^{-1}, \lambda^{-2}, \ldots, \lambda^{-n}, 0,0, \ldots\right) .

Prove that ∥xn∥=1\left\|x_{n}\right\|=1 but that (S−λI)xn→0(S-\lambda I) x_{n} \rightarrow 0 as n→∞n \rightarrow \infty. Deduce that, for ∣λ∣=1,S−λI|\lambda|=1, S-\lambda I is not bounded below.

Typos? Please submit corrections to this page on GitHub.