Paper 3, Section II, H

Statistics | Part IB, 2019

Suppose that X1,,XnX_{1}, \ldots, X_{n} are i.i.d. N(μ,σ2)N\left(\mu, \sigma^{2}\right). Let

Xˉ=1ni=1nXi and SXX=i=1n(XiXˉ)2\bar{X}=\frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^{n} X_{i} \quad \text { and } \quad S_{X X}=\sum_{i=1}^{n}\left(X_{i}-\bar{X}\right)^{2}

(a) Compute the distributions of Xˉ\bar{X} and SXXS_{X X} and show that Xˉ\bar{X} and SXXS_{X X} are independent.

(b) Write down the distribution of n(Xˉμ)/SXX/(n1)\sqrt{n}(\bar{X}-\mu) / \sqrt{S_{X X} /(n-1)}.

(c) For α(0,1)\alpha \in(0,1), find a 100(1α)%100(1-\alpha) \% confidence interval in each of the following situations: (i) for μ\mu when σ2\sigma^{2} is known; (ii) for μ\mu when σ2\sigma^{2} is not known; (iii) for σ2\sigma^{2} when μ\mu is not known.

(d) Suppose that X~1,,X~n~\widetilde{X}_{1}, \ldots, \widetilde{X}_{\widetilde{n}} are i.i.d. N(μ~,σ~2)N\left(\widetilde{\mu}, \widetilde{\sigma}^{2}\right). Explain how you would use the FF test to test the hypothesis H1:σ2>σ~2H_{1}: \sigma^{2}>\tilde{\sigma}^{2} against the hypothesis H0:σ2=σ~2H_{0}: \sigma^{2}=\tilde{\sigma}^{2}. Does the FF test depend on whether μ,μ~\mu, \widetilde{\mu} are known?

Typos? Please submit corrections to this page on GitHub.