Paper 4, Section II, G

Logic and Set Theory | Part II, 2013

State the Axiom of Foundation and the Principle of \in-Induction, and show that they are equivalent in the presence of the other axioms of ZF set theory. [You may assume the existence of transitive closures.]

Given a model (V,)(V, \in) for all the axioms of ZF except Foundation, show how to define a transitive class RR which, with the restriction of the given relation \in, is a model of ZF.

Given a model (V,)(V, \in) of ZF\mathrm{ZF}, indicate briefly how one may modify the relation \in so that the resulting structure (V,)\left(V, \in^{\prime}\right) fails to satisfy Foundation, but satisfies all the other axioms of ZF\mathrm{ZF}. [You need not verify that all the other axioms hold in (V,)\left(V, \in^{\prime}\right).]

Typos? Please submit corrections to this page on GitHub.