Paper 3, Section II, G

Logic and Set Theory | Part II, 2013

Explain carefully what is meant by syntactic entailment and semantic entailment in the propositional calculus. State the Completeness Theorem for the propositional calculus, and deduce the Compactness Theorem.

Suppose P,QP, Q and RR are pairwise disjoint sets of primitive propositions, and let ϕL(PQ)\phi \in \mathcal{L}(P \cup Q) and ψL(QR)\psi \in \mathcal{L}(Q \cup R) be propositional formulae such that (ϕψ)(\phi \Rightarrow \psi) is a theorem of the propositional calculus. Consider the set

X={χL(Q)ϕχ}X=\{\chi \in \mathcal{L}(Q) \mid \phi \vdash \chi\}

Show that X{¬ψ}X \cup\{\neg \psi\} is inconsistent, and deduce that there exists χL(Q)\chi \in \mathcal{L}(Q) such that both (ϕχ)(\phi \Rightarrow \chi) and (χψ)(\chi \Rightarrow \psi) are theorems. [Hint: assuming X{¬ψ}X \cup\{\neg \psi\} is consistent, take a suitable valuation vv of QRQ \cup R and show that

{ϕ}{qQv(q)=1}{¬qqQ,v(q)=0}\{\phi\} \cup\{q \in Q \mid v(q)=1\} \cup\{\neg q \mid q \in Q, v(q)=0\}

is inconsistent. The Deduction Theorem may be assumed without proof.]

Typos? Please submit corrections to this page on GitHub.